Zionist ideology and the intensifying conflict between Western and Eastern Jews

By Ghaith Al-Obeidi

In general, Israelis realized after the blessed Al-Aqsa flood operation that they are heading towards a great chasm. Between the people and themselves on the one hand and between the people and the government on the other so that “the individual against the family, the family against half of society, half of the eastern society against its western half, all society against the government, and the government against itself.

Some experts, analysts, strategists, and diplomats argue that they have already slipped into the “valley” that cannot be saved! Some experts, analysts, strategists, and diplomats argue that they have already slipped into a “canyon” from which there is no escape or control.

We can say that it was the Al-Aqsa Flood operation that embodied and highlighted the concepts of internal Zionist conflicts and disputes in the manner we see today, and that it transformed ideas and feelings and brought them out of their shells to become tangible physical objects.

The relationship between Eastern Jews and Western Jews, and the relationship of both of them to Zionism, is based on “separation and communication, exclusion and integration.”

According to Zionism, as a “national, ethnic, secular, and pure movement,” one must be either an atheist or a good Jew, and this does not appeal to religious Jews, whether they are Eastern or Western, and is considered a direct threat to them, while non-religious Western Jews considered it the only movement that preserves their existence, by monopolizing the secular Jewish world in all of Israel, and excluding Eastern secularists from it.

While non-religious Western Jews considered Zionism to be the only movement that preserves their existence by monopolizing the secular Jewish world in all of Israel and excluding Eastern secularists from it, so it was considered in popular Jewish circles that Zionism is directed against religion on the one hand, and against Eastern Jews on the other!!

Therefore, it can be concluded that the relationship between the above trio is a provocative and complex relationship, which was previously secret and after the Al-Aqsa flood became public, for reasons related to the brutal image that Zionism showed them before the whole world, so that this conflict exists either “by amputating Zionism or those who represent it and ensuring the continuity of Israel” or “its survival and the demise of Israel.”

Share this: